Top 10 Build Candidates — tap to expand
#1 · FCF Efficency × Quality Value Score × RSI-Net EBITDA Signal × RSI x Avg Eps Growth
BLOCKED
T1 +1.5pp · T2 +21.57pp ·
held 83% / ctrl 82% · k=4
WHAT — Plain English
Build composite metric from 4 components: FCF Efficency × Quality Value Score × RSI-Net EBITDA Signal × RSI x Avg Eps Growth.
Name TBD — pick during /buildmetric.
WHY — Separation Evidence
Type 1 · classifier lift (held − ctrl winrate)
+1.5pp
Type 2 · real return spread (passers − failers actual returns, pilot)
+21.57pp
Type 2 confidence
HIGH · 100% cov · 0C/0F/100S/0H
Control win rate
81.8% (n=11)
Classification
INVESTIGATE
HOW — Build Path
Quality Value Score
✓ READY
RSI-Net EBITDA Signal
⚠ INVESTIGATE
RSI x Avg Eps Growth
⚠ INVESTIGATE
Blocker
RSI-Net EBITDA Signal — Holdings agrees but control disagrees — review secondary metrics sheet
#2 · PFCF v EBITDA × Avg. EPS Growth × FCF-EBITDA Convergence Score × RSI-Net EBITDA Signal
BLOCKED
T1 -15.0pp · T2 +18.93pp ·
held 75% / ctrl 90% · k=4
WHAT — Plain English
Build composite metric from 4 components: PFCF v EBITDA × Avg. EPS Growth × FCF-EBITDA Convergence Score × RSI-Net EBITDA Signal.
Name TBD — pick during /buildmetric.
WHY — Separation Evidence
Type 1 · classifier lift (held − ctrl winrate)
-15.0pp
Type 2 · real return spread (passers − failers actual returns, pilot)
+18.93pp
Type 2 confidence
HIGH · 100% cov · 0C/0F/82S/0H
Control win rate
90.0% (n=10)
Classification
INVESTIGATE
HOW — Build Path
Avg. EPS Growth
⚠ INVESTIGATE
FCF-EBITDA Convergence Score
✓ READY
RSI-Net EBITDA Signal
⚠ INVESTIGATE
Blocker
Avg. EPS Growth — Control agrees but holdings dir_status=at_risk — review secondary metrics sheet
#3 · PFCF v EBITDA × Avg. EPS Growth × RSI-Net EBITDA Signal × FCF Quality Score
BLOCKED
T1 -15.9pp · T2 +17.53pp ·
held 75% / ctrl 91% · k=4
WHAT — Plain English
Build composite metric from 4 components: PFCF v EBITDA × Avg. EPS Growth × RSI-Net EBITDA Signal × FCF Quality Score.
Name TBD — pick during /buildmetric.
WHY — Separation Evidence
Type 1 · classifier lift (held − ctrl winrate)
-15.9pp
Type 2 · real return spread (passers − failers actual returns, pilot)
+17.53pp
Type 2 confidence
HIGH · 100% cov · 0C/0F/89S/0H
Control win rate
90.9% (n=11)
Classification
INVESTIGATE
HOW — Build Path
Avg. EPS Growth
⚠ INVESTIGATE
RSI-Net EBITDA Signal
⚠ INVESTIGATE
Blocker
Avg. EPS Growth — Control agrees but holdings dir_status=at_risk — review secondary metrics sheet
#4 · FCF Efficency × Avg. EPS Growth × FCF-EBITDA Convergence Score × RSI-Net EBITDA Signal
BLOCKED
T1 -1.2pp · T2 +17.32pp ·
held 82% / ctrl 83% · k=4
WHAT — Plain English
Build composite metric from 4 components: FCF Efficency × Avg. EPS Growth × FCF-EBITDA Convergence Score × RSI-Net EBITDA Signal.
Name TBD — pick during /buildmetric.
WHY — Separation Evidence
Type 1 · classifier lift (held − ctrl winrate)
-1.2pp
Type 2 · real return spread (passers − failers actual returns, pilot)
+17.32pp
Type 2 confidence
HIGH · 100% cov · 0C/0F/95S/0H
Control win rate
83.3% (n=12)
Classification
INVESTIGATE
HOW — Build Path
Avg. EPS Growth
⚠ INVESTIGATE
FCF-EBITDA Convergence Score
✓ READY
RSI-Net EBITDA Signal
⚠ INVESTIGATE
Blocker
Avg. EPS Growth — Control agrees but holdings dir_status=at_risk — review secondary metrics sheet
#5 · Avg. EPS Growth × FCF-EBITDA Convergence Score × RSI-Net EBITDA Signal × RSI x Avg Eps Growth
BLOCKED
T1 -3.3pp · T2 +17.10pp ·
held 80% / ctrl 83% · k=4
WHAT — Plain English
Build composite metric from 4 components: Avg. EPS Growth × FCF-EBITDA Convergence Score × RSI-Net EBITDA Signal × RSI x Avg Eps Growth.
Name TBD — pick during /buildmetric.
WHY — Separation Evidence
Type 1 · classifier lift (held − ctrl winrate)
-3.3pp
Type 2 · real return spread (passers − failers actual returns, pilot)
+17.10pp
Type 2 confidence
HIGH · 100% cov · 0C/0F/91S/0H
Control win rate
83.3% (n=12)
Classification
INVESTIGATE
HOW — Build Path
Avg. EPS Growth
⚠ INVESTIGATE
FCF-EBITDA Convergence Score
✓ READY
RSI-Net EBITDA Signal
⚠ INVESTIGATE
RSI x Avg Eps Growth
⚠ INVESTIGATE
Blocker
Avg. EPS Growth — Control agrees but holdings dir_status=at_risk — review secondary metrics sheet
#6 · Quality Value Score × FCF-EBITDA Convergence Score × RSI-Net EBITDA Signal × RSI x Avg Eps Growth
BLOCKED
T1 +1.5pp · T2 +16.86pp ·
held 83% / ctrl 82% · k=4
WHAT — Plain English
Build composite metric from 4 components: Quality Value Score × FCF-EBITDA Convergence Score × RSI-Net EBITDA Signal × RSI x Avg Eps Growth.
Name TBD — pick during /buildmetric.
WHY — Separation Evidence
Type 1 · classifier lift (held − ctrl winrate)
+1.5pp
Type 2 · real return spread (passers − failers actual returns, pilot)
+16.86pp
Type 2 confidence
HIGH · 100% cov · 0C/0F/93S/0H
Control win rate
81.8% (n=11)
Classification
INVESTIGATE
HOW — Build Path
Quality Value Score
✓ READY
FCF-EBITDA Convergence Score
✓ READY
RSI-Net EBITDA Signal
⚠ INVESTIGATE
RSI x Avg Eps Growth
⚠ INVESTIGATE
Blocker
RSI-Net EBITDA Signal — Holdings agrees but control disagrees — review secondary metrics sheet
#7 · FCF Efficency × Avg. EPS Growth × RSI-Net EBITDA Signal × FCF Quality Score
BLOCKED
T1 -2.5pp · T2 +16.30pp ·
held 82% / ctrl 85% · k=4
WHAT — Plain English
Build composite metric from 4 components: FCF Efficency × Avg. EPS Growth × RSI-Net EBITDA Signal × FCF Quality Score.
Name TBD — pick during /buildmetric.
WHY — Separation Evidence
Type 1 · classifier lift (held − ctrl winrate)
-2.5pp
Type 2 · real return spread (passers − failers actual returns, pilot)
+16.30pp
Type 2 confidence
HIGH · 100% cov · 0C/0F/104S/0H
Control win rate
84.6% (n=13)
Classification
INVESTIGATE
HOW — Build Path
Avg. EPS Growth
⚠ INVESTIGATE
RSI-Net EBITDA Signal
⚠ INVESTIGATE
Blocker
Avg. EPS Growth — Control agrees but holdings dir_status=at_risk — review secondary metrics sheet
#8 · FCF Efficency × Avg. EPS Growth × RSI-Net EBITDA Signal × SM Watson 5
BLOCKED
T1 -7.3pp · T2 +16.16pp ·
held 77% / ctrl 85% · k=4
WHAT — Plain English
Build composite metric from 4 components: FCF Efficency × Avg. EPS Growth × RSI-Net EBITDA Signal × SM Watson 5.
Name TBD — pick during /buildmetric.
WHY — Separation Evidence
Type 1 · classifier lift (held − ctrl winrate)
-7.3pp
Type 2 · real return spread (passers − failers actual returns, pilot)
+16.16pp
Type 2 confidence
HIGH · 100% cov · 0C/0F/95S/0H
Control win rate
84.6% (n=13)
Classification
INVESTIGATE
HOW — Build Path
Avg. EPS Growth
⚠ INVESTIGATE
RSI-Net EBITDA Signal
⚠ INVESTIGATE
Blocker
Avg. EPS Growth — Control agrees but holdings dir_status=at_risk — review secondary metrics sheet
#9 · Avg. EPS Growth × RSI-Net EBITDA Signal × FCF Quality Score × RSI x Avg Eps Growth
BLOCKED
T1 -4.6pp · T2 +16.12pp ·
held 80% / ctrl 85% · k=4
WHAT — Plain English
Build composite metric from 4 components: Avg. EPS Growth × RSI-Net EBITDA Signal × FCF Quality Score × RSI x Avg Eps Growth.
Name TBD — pick during /buildmetric.
WHY — Separation Evidence
Type 1 · classifier lift (held − ctrl winrate)
-4.6pp
Type 2 · real return spread (passers − failers actual returns, pilot)
+16.12pp
Type 2 confidence
HIGH · 100% cov · 0C/0F/98S/0H
Control win rate
84.6% (n=13)
Classification
INVESTIGATE
HOW — Build Path
Avg. EPS Growth
⚠ INVESTIGATE
RSI-Net EBITDA Signal
⚠ INVESTIGATE
RSI x Avg Eps Growth
⚠ INVESTIGATE
Blocker
Avg. EPS Growth — Control agrees but holdings dir_status=at_risk — review secondary metrics sheet
#10 · FCF Efficency × Quality Value Score × Avg. EPS Growth × RSI-Net EBITDA Signal
BLOCKED
T1 +5.1pp · T2 +16.05pp ·
held 88% / ctrl 83% · k=4
WHAT — Plain English
Build composite metric from 4 components: FCF Efficency × Quality Value Score × Avg. EPS Growth × RSI-Net EBITDA Signal.
Name TBD — pick during /buildmetric.
WHY — Separation Evidence
Type 1 · classifier lift (held − ctrl winrate)
+5.1pp
Type 2 · real return spread (passers − failers actual returns, pilot)
+16.05pp
Type 2 confidence
HIGH · 100% cov · 0C/0F/102S/0H
Control win rate
83.3% (n=12)
Classification
INVESTIGATE
HOW — Build Path
Quality Value Score
✓ READY
Avg. EPS Growth
⚠ INVESTIGATE
RSI-Net EBITDA Signal
⚠ INVESTIGATE
Blocker
Avg. EPS Growth — Control agrees but holdings dir_status=at_risk — review secondary metrics sheet
▾ Show #11–25 (15 more)
#11 · Quality Value Score × RSI-Net EBITDA Signal × FCF Quality Score × RSI x Avg Eps Growth
BLOCKED
T1 +0.0pp · T2 +15.81pp ·
held 83% / ctrl 83% · k=4
WHAT — Plain English
Build composite metric from 4 components: Quality Value Score × RSI-Net EBITDA Signal × FCF Quality Score × RSI x Avg Eps Growth.
Name TBD — pick during /buildmetric.
WHY — Separation Evidence
Type 1 · classifier lift (held − ctrl winrate)
+0.0pp
Type 2 · real return spread (passers − failers actual returns, pilot)
+15.81pp
Type 2 confidence
HIGH · 100% cov · 0C/0F/99S/0H
Control win rate
83.3% (n=12)
Classification
INVESTIGATE
HOW — Build Path
Quality Value Score
✓ READY
RSI-Net EBITDA Signal
⚠ INVESTIGATE
RSI x Avg Eps Growth
⚠ INVESTIGATE
Blocker
RSI-Net EBITDA Signal — Holdings agrees but control disagrees — review secondary metrics sheet
#12 · Avg. EPS Growth × FCF-EBITDA Convergence Score × RSI-Net EBITDA Signal × FCF Quality Score
BLOCKED
T1 -2.5pp · T2 +15.46pp ·
held 82% / ctrl 85% · k=4
WHAT — Plain English
Build composite metric from 4 components: Avg. EPS Growth × FCF-EBITDA Convergence Score × RSI-Net EBITDA Signal × FCF Quality Score.
Name TBD — pick during /buildmetric.
WHY — Separation Evidence
Type 1 · classifier lift (held − ctrl winrate)
-2.5pp
Type 2 · real return spread (passers − failers actual returns, pilot)
+15.46pp
Type 2 confidence
HIGH · 100% cov · 0C/0F/95S/0H
Control win rate
84.6% (n=13)
Classification
INVESTIGATE
HOW — Build Path
Avg. EPS Growth
⚠ INVESTIGATE
FCF-EBITDA Convergence Score
✓ READY
RSI-Net EBITDA Signal
⚠ INVESTIGATE
Blocker
Avg. EPS Growth — Control agrees but holdings dir_status=at_risk — review secondary metrics sheet
#13 · Quality Value Score × RSI-Net EBITDA Signal × RSI x Avg Eps Growth
BLOCKED
T1 -3.3pp · T2 +15.27pp ·
held 80% / ctrl 83% · k=3
WHAT — Plain English
Build composite metric from 3 components: Quality Value Score × RSI-Net EBITDA Signal × RSI x Avg Eps Growth.
Name TBD — pick during /buildmetric.
WHY — Separation Evidence
Type 1 · classifier lift (held − ctrl winrate)
-3.3pp
Type 2 · real return spread (passers − failers actual returns, pilot)
+15.27pp
Type 2 confidence
HIGH · 98% cov · 0C/0F/102S/0H
Control win rate
83.3% (n=12)
Classification
INVESTIGATE
HOW — Build Path
Quality Value Score
✓ READY
RSI-Net EBITDA Signal
⚠ INVESTIGATE
RSI x Avg Eps Growth
⚠ INVESTIGATE
Blocker
RSI-Net EBITDA Signal — Holdings agrees but control disagrees — review secondary metrics sheet
#14 · Avg. EPS Growth × FCF-EBITDA Convergence Score × RSI-Net EBITDA Signal × SM Watson 5
BLOCKED
T1 -7.3pp · T2 +15.21pp ·
held 77% / ctrl 85% · k=4
WHAT — Plain English
Build composite metric from 4 components: Avg. EPS Growth × FCF-EBITDA Convergence Score × RSI-Net EBITDA Signal × SM Watson 5.
Name TBD — pick during /buildmetric.
WHY — Separation Evidence
Type 1 · classifier lift (held − ctrl winrate)
-7.3pp
Type 2 · real return spread (passers − failers actual returns, pilot)
+15.21pp
Type 2 confidence
HIGH · 100% cov · 0C/0F/86S/0H
Control win rate
84.6% (n=13)
Classification
INVESTIGATE
HOW — Build Path
Avg. EPS Growth
⚠ INVESTIGATE
FCF-EBITDA Convergence Score
✓ READY
RSI-Net EBITDA Signal
⚠ INVESTIGATE
Blocker
Avg. EPS Growth — Control agrees but holdings dir_status=at_risk — review secondary metrics sheet
#15 · Avg. EPS Growth × FCF-EBITDA Convergence Score × RSI-Net EBITDA Signal
BLOCKED
T1 -2.5pp · T2 +14.90pp ·
held 82% / ctrl 85% · k=3
WHAT — Plain English
Build composite metric from 3 components: Avg. EPS Growth × FCF-EBITDA Convergence Score × RSI-Net EBITDA Signal.
Name TBD — pick during /buildmetric.
WHY — Separation Evidence
Type 1 · classifier lift (held − ctrl winrate)
-2.5pp
Type 2 · real return spread (passers − failers actual returns, pilot)
+14.90pp
Type 2 confidence
HIGH · 100% cov · 0C/0F/97S/0H
Control win rate
84.6% (n=13)
Classification
INVESTIGATE
HOW — Build Path
Avg. EPS Growth
⚠ INVESTIGATE
FCF-EBITDA Convergence Score
✓ READY
RSI-Net EBITDA Signal
⚠ INVESTIGATE
Blocker
Avg. EPS Growth — Control agrees but holdings dir_status=at_risk — review secondary metrics sheet
#16 · Avg. EPS Growth × RSI-Net EBITDA Signal × FCF Quality Score
BLOCKED
T1 -3.6pp · T2 +14.03pp ·
held 82% / ctrl 86% · k=3
WHAT — Plain English
Build composite metric from 3 components: Avg. EPS Growth × RSI-Net EBITDA Signal × FCF Quality Score.
Name TBD — pick during /buildmetric.
WHY — Separation Evidence
Type 1 · classifier lift (held − ctrl winrate)
-3.6pp
Type 2 · real return spread (passers − failers actual returns, pilot)
+14.03pp
Type 2 confidence
HIGH · 100% cov · 0C/0F/105S/0H
Control win rate
85.7% (n=14)
Classification
INVESTIGATE
HOW — Build Path
Avg. EPS Growth
⚠ INVESTIGATE
RSI-Net EBITDA Signal
⚠ INVESTIGATE
Blocker
Avg. EPS Growth — Control agrees but holdings dir_status=at_risk — review secondary metrics sheet
#17 · Avg. EPS Growth × RSI-Net EBITDA Signal × SM Watson 5 × FCF Quality Score
BLOCKED
T1 -8.4pp · T2 +13.81pp ·
held 77% / ctrl 86% · k=4
WHAT — Plain English
Build composite metric from 4 components: Avg. EPS Growth × RSI-Net EBITDA Signal × SM Watson 5 × FCF Quality Score.
Name TBD — pick during /buildmetric.
WHY — Separation Evidence
Type 1 · classifier lift (held − ctrl winrate)
-8.4pp
Type 2 · real return spread (passers − failers actual returns, pilot)
+13.81pp
Type 2 confidence
HIGH · 100% cov · 0C/0F/95S/0H
Control win rate
85.7% (n=14)
Classification
INVESTIGATE
HOW — Build Path
Avg. EPS Growth
⚠ INVESTIGATE
RSI-Net EBITDA Signal
⚠ INVESTIGATE
Blocker
Avg. EPS Growth — Control agrees but holdings dir_status=at_risk — review secondary metrics sheet
#18 · Quality Value Score × Avg. EPS Growth × RSI-Net EBITDA Signal × RSI x Avg Eps Growth
BLOCKED
T1 +0.0pp · T2 +12.09pp ·
held 83% / ctrl 83% · k=4
WHAT — Plain English
Build composite metric from 4 components: Quality Value Score × Avg. EPS Growth × RSI-Net EBITDA Signal × RSI x Avg Eps Growth.
Name TBD — pick during /buildmetric.
WHY — Separation Evidence
Type 1 · classifier lift (held − ctrl winrate)
+0.0pp
Type 2 · real return spread (passers − failers actual returns, pilot)
+12.09pp
Type 2 confidence
HIGH · 98% cov · 0C/0F/97S/0H
Control win rate
83.3% (n=12)
Classification
INVESTIGATE
HOW — Build Path
Quality Value Score
✓ READY
Avg. EPS Growth
⚠ INVESTIGATE
RSI-Net EBITDA Signal
⚠ INVESTIGATE
RSI x Avg Eps Growth
⚠ INVESTIGATE
Blocker
Avg. EPS Growth — Control agrees but holdings dir_status=at_risk — review secondary metrics sheet
#19 · Quality Value Score × PFCF v EBITDA × Avg. EPS Growth × RSI-Net EBITDA Signal
BLOCKED
T1 -11.1pp · T2 +11.62pp ·
held 79% / ctrl 90% · k=4
WHAT — Plain English
Build composite metric from 4 components: Quality Value Score × PFCF v EBITDA × Avg. EPS Growth × RSI-Net EBITDA Signal.
Name TBD — pick during /buildmetric.
WHY — Separation Evidence
Type 1 · classifier lift (held − ctrl winrate)
-11.1pp
Type 2 · real return spread (passers − failers actual returns, pilot)
+11.62pp
Type 2 confidence
HIGH · 98% cov · 0C/0F/86S/0H
Control win rate
90.0% (n=10)
Classification
INVESTIGATE
HOW — Build Path
Quality Value Score
✓ READY
Avg. EPS Growth
⚠ INVESTIGATE
RSI-Net EBITDA Signal
⚠ INVESTIGATE
Blocker
Avg. EPS Growth — Control agrees but holdings dir_status=at_risk — review secondary metrics sheet
#20 · Quality Value Score × Avg. EPS Growth × FCF-EBITDA Convergence Score × RSI-Net EBITDA Signal
BLOCKED
T1 +5.1pp · T2 +11.19pp ·
held 88% / ctrl 83% · k=4
WHAT — Plain English
Build composite metric from 4 components: Quality Value Score × Avg. EPS Growth × FCF-EBITDA Convergence Score × RSI-Net EBITDA Signal.
Name TBD — pick during /buildmetric.
WHY — Separation Evidence
Type 1 · classifier lift (held − ctrl winrate)
+5.1pp
Type 2 · real return spread (passers − failers actual returns, pilot)
+11.19pp
Type 2 confidence
HIGH · 100% cov · 0C/0F/94S/0H
Control win rate
83.3% (n=12)
Classification
INVESTIGATE
HOW — Build Path
Quality Value Score
✓ READY
Avg. EPS Growth
⚠ INVESTIGATE
FCF-EBITDA Convergence Score
✓ READY
RSI-Net EBITDA Signal
⚠ INVESTIGATE
Blocker
Avg. EPS Growth — Control agrees but holdings dir_status=at_risk — review secondary metrics sheet
#21 · Quality Value Score × Avg. EPS Growth × RSI-Net EBITDA Signal × FCF Quality Score
BLOCKED
T1 +3.8pp · T2 +10.38pp ·
held 88% / ctrl 85% · k=4
WHAT — Plain English
Build composite metric from 4 components: Quality Value Score × Avg. EPS Growth × RSI-Net EBITDA Signal × FCF Quality Score.
Name TBD — pick during /buildmetric.
WHY — Separation Evidence
Type 1 · classifier lift (held − ctrl winrate)
+3.8pp
Type 2 · real return spread (passers − failers actual returns, pilot)
+10.38pp
Type 2 confidence
HIGH · 100% cov · 0C/0F/101S/0H
Control win rate
84.6% (n=13)
Classification
INVESTIGATE
HOW — Build Path
Quality Value Score
✓ READY
Avg. EPS Growth
⚠ INVESTIGATE
RSI-Net EBITDA Signal
⚠ INVESTIGATE
Blocker
Avg. EPS Growth — Control agrees but holdings dir_status=at_risk — review secondary metrics sheet
#22 · Quality Value Score × Avg. EPS Growth × RSI-Net EBITDA Signal × SM Watson 5
BLOCKED
T1 -3.7pp · T2 +10.31pp ·
held 81% / ctrl 85% · k=4
WHAT — Plain English
Build composite metric from 4 components: Quality Value Score × Avg. EPS Growth × RSI-Net EBITDA Signal × SM Watson 5.
Name TBD — pick during /buildmetric.
WHY — Separation Evidence
Type 1 · classifier lift (held − ctrl winrate)
-3.7pp
Type 2 · real return spread (passers − failers actual returns, pilot)
+10.31pp
Type 2 confidence
HIGH · 98% cov · 0C/0F/92S/0H
Control win rate
84.6% (n=13)
Classification
INVESTIGATE
HOW — Build Path
Quality Value Score
✓ READY
Avg. EPS Growth
⚠ INVESTIGATE
RSI-Net EBITDA Signal
⚠ INVESTIGATE
Blocker
Avg. EPS Growth — Control agrees but holdings dir_status=at_risk — review secondary metrics sheet
#23 · Quality Value Score × Avg. EPS Growth × RSI-Net EBITDA Signal
BLOCKED
T1 +0.6pp · T2 +10.00pp ·
held 85% / ctrl 85% · k=3
WHAT — Plain English
Build composite metric from 3 components: Quality Value Score × Avg. EPS Growth × RSI-Net EBITDA Signal.
Name TBD — pick during /buildmetric.
WHY — Separation Evidence
Type 1 · classifier lift (held − ctrl winrate)
+0.6pp
Type 2 · real return spread (passers − failers actual returns, pilot)
+10.00pp
Type 2 confidence
HIGH · 98% cov · 0C/0F/104S/0H
Control win rate
84.6% (n=13)
Classification
INVESTIGATE
HOW — Build Path
Quality Value Score
✓ READY
Avg. EPS Growth
⚠ INVESTIGATE
RSI-Net EBITDA Signal
⚠ INVESTIGATE
Blocker
Avg. EPS Growth — Control agrees but holdings dir_status=at_risk — review secondary metrics sheet
#24 · Avg. EPS Growth × RSI-Net EBITDA Signal × Watson-ROIC Confidence Index × FCF Quality Score
BLOCKED
T1 +4.2pp · T2 +9.75pp ·
held 84% / ctrl 80% · k=4
WHAT — Plain English
Build composite metric from 4 components: Avg. EPS Growth × RSI-Net EBITDA Signal × Watson-ROIC Confidence Index × FCF Quality Score.
Name TBD — pick during /buildmetric.
WHY — Separation Evidence
Type 1 · classifier lift (held − ctrl winrate)
+4.2pp
Type 2 · real return spread (passers − failers actual returns, pilot)
+9.75pp
Type 2 confidence
HIGH · 100% cov · 0C/0F/54S/0H
Control win rate
80.0% (n=10)
Classification
NOT_ENOUGH_DATA
HOW — Build Path
Avg. EPS Growth
⚠ INVESTIGATE
RSI-Net EBITDA Signal
⚠ INVESTIGATE
Watson-ROIC Confidence Index
⚠ NOT_ENOUGH_DATA
Blocker
Avg. EPS Growth — Control agrees but holdings dir_status=at_risk — review secondary metrics sheet; Watson-ROIC Confidence Index — ctrl n_outperformers=0 < 50 — track, do not act
#25 · Quality Value Score × Avg. EPS Growth × Risk to Value Growth × Weighted FCF Efficiency
BLOCKED
T1 +9.4pp · T2 +6.44pp ·
held 86% / ctrl 77% · k=4
WHAT — Plain English
Build composite metric from 4 components: Quality Value Score × Avg. EPS Growth × Risk to Value Growth × Weighted FCF Efficiency.
Name TBD — pick during /buildmetric.
WHY — Separation Evidence
Type 1 · classifier lift (held − ctrl winrate)
+9.4pp
Type 2 · real return spread (passers − failers actual returns, pilot)
+6.44pp
Type 2 confidence
HIGH · 91% cov · 0C/0F/141S/0H
Control win rate
76.9% (n=13)
Classification
INVESTIGATE
HOW — Build Path
Quality Value Score
✓ READY
Avg. EPS Growth
⚠ INVESTIGATE
Risk to Value Growth
⚠ INVESTIGATE
Weighted FCF Efficiency
✓ READY
Blocker
Avg. EPS Growth — Control agrees but holdings dir_status=at_risk — review secondary metrics sheet
▾ L1+L2 Hybrid Candidates (10 of 14,198) — tap to expand
Combos drawn from L1+L2 hybrid pool — each contains ≥1 L1 metric. Sorted by lift pp.
#1 · Avg. EPS Growth + P/C + P/B ÷ (FCF Yield+1)
A
lift +79.5pp ·
wr 100% (base 21%) · k=3 · n=22
Combo
Avg. EPS Growth + P/C + P/B ÷ (FCF Yield+1)
Win rate
100.0% (baseline 20.51%)
#2 · Avg. EPS Growth + P/C + P/B ÷ FCF Yield
A
lift +79.5pp ·
wr 100% (base 21%) · k=3 · n=22
Combo
Avg. EPS Growth + P/C + P/B ÷ FCF Yield
Win rate
100.0% (baseline 20.51%)
#3 · Avg. EPS Growth + P/C + P/B ÷ (FCF Yield+1) + P/B ÷ FCF Yiel
A
lift +79.5pp ·
wr 100% (base 21%) · k=4 · n=22
Combo
Avg. EPS Growth + P/C + P/B ÷ (FCF Yield+1) + P/B ÷ FCF Yield
Win rate
100.0% (baseline 20.51%)
#4 · Risk to Value Growth + P/C
A
lift +79.5pp ·
wr 100% (base 21%) · k=2 · n=21
Combo
Risk to Value Growth + P/C
Win rate
100.0% (baseline 20.51%)
#5 · Quality Value Score + Risk to Value Growth + P/C
A
lift +79.5pp ·
wr 100% (base 21%) · k=3 · n=21
Combo
Quality Value Score + Risk to Value Growth + P/C
Win rate
100.0% (baseline 20.51%)
#6 · Avg. EPS Growth + P/C + P/B × P/FCF
A
lift +79.5pp ·
wr 100% (base 21%) · k=3 · n=21
Combo
Avg. EPS Growth + P/C + P/B × P/FCF
Win rate
100.0% (baseline 20.51%)
#7 · Risk to Value Growth + P/C + P/B ÷ (FCF Yield+1)
A
lift +79.5pp ·
wr 100% (base 21%) · k=3 · n=21
Combo
Risk to Value Growth + P/C + P/B ÷ (FCF Yield+1)
Win rate
100.0% (baseline 20.51%)
#8 · Risk to Value Growth + P/C + P/B × P/FCF
A
lift +79.5pp ·
wr 100% (base 21%) · k=3 · n=21
Combo
Risk to Value Growth + P/C + P/B × P/FCF
Win rate
100.0% (baseline 20.51%)
#9 · Risk to Value Growth + P/C + P/B ÷ FCF Yield
A
lift +79.5pp ·
wr 100% (base 21%) · k=3 · n=21
Combo
Risk to Value Growth + P/C + P/B ÷ FCF Yield
Win rate
100.0% (baseline 20.51%)
#10 · FCF Efficency + P/B + Risk to Value Growth + ROIC × P/S
A
lift +79.5pp ·
wr 100% (base 21%) · k=4 · n=21
Combo
FCF Efficency + P/B + Risk to Value Growth + ROIC × P/S
Win rate
100.0% (baseline 20.51%)
What This Means
Build Lab ranks BF combos by signal strength.
Sep pp = held win rate − control win rate (the separation mechanism).
Ready = all components built; can run /buildmetric directly.
Blocked = a component is missing or unbuilt — see expanded row for blocker reason.
ℹ Generated 2026-05-23 18:32:04 ET
Source: metric_build_queue_new.csv
Pipeline run: 2026-05-23