Top 10 Build Candidates — tap to expand
#1 · Avg. EPS Growth × FCF-EBITDA Convergence Score × Quality Value Score × PFCF vs PE Spread
READY
T1 +12.2pp · T2 +13.61pp ·
held 82% / ctrl 70% · k=4
WHAT — Plain English
Build composite metric from 4 components: Avg. EPS Growth × FCF-EBITDA Convergence Score × Quality Value Score × PFCF vs PE Spread.
Name TBD — pick during /buildmetric.
WHY — Separation Evidence
Type 1 · classifier lift (held − ctrl winrate)
+12.2pp
Type 2 · real return spread (passers − failers actual returns, pilot)
+13.61pp
Type 2 confidence
HIGH · 84% cov · 2C/0F/141S/0H
Control win rate
69.6% (n=23)
HOW — Build Path
FCF-EBITDA Convergence Score
✓ READY
Quality Value Score
✓ READY
#2 · Avg. EPS Growth × FCF-EBITDA Convergence Score × PFCF vs PE Spread × CARC
READY
T1 +9.2pp · T2 +13.41pp ·
held 80% / ctrl 71% · k=4
WHAT — Plain English
Build composite metric from 4 components: Avg. EPS Growth × FCF-EBITDA Convergence Score × PFCF vs PE Spread × CARC.
Name TBD — pick during /buildmetric.
WHY — Separation Evidence
Type 1 · classifier lift (held − ctrl winrate)
+9.2pp
Type 2 · real return spread (passers − failers actual returns, pilot)
+13.41pp
Type 2 confidence
HIGH · 79% cov · 3C/0F/142S/0H
Control win rate
70.8% (n=24)
HOW — Build Path
FCF-EBITDA Convergence Score
✓ READY
#3 · Avg. EPS Growth × FCF-EBITDA Convergence Score × PFCF vs PE Spread
READY
T1 +15.3pp · T2 +13.25pp ·
held 83% / ctrl 68% · k=3
WHAT — Plain English
Build composite metric from 3 components: Avg. EPS Growth × FCF-EBITDA Convergence Score × PFCF vs PE Spread.
Name TBD — pick during /buildmetric.
WHY — Separation Evidence
Type 1 · classifier lift (held − ctrl winrate)
+15.3pp
Type 2 · real return spread (passers − failers actual returns, pilot)
+13.25pp
Type 2 confidence
HIGH · 79% cov · 3C/0F/145S/0H
Control win rate
68.0% (n=25)
HOW — Build Path
FCF-EBITDA Convergence Score
✓ READY
#4 · Avg. EPS Growth × FCF Efficency × PFCF vs PE Spread × SM Watson 3
BLOCKED
T1 +5.7pp · T2 +10.31pp ·
held 86% / ctrl 80% · k=4
WHAT — Plain English
Build composite metric from 4 components: Avg. EPS Growth × FCF Efficency × PFCF vs PE Spread × SM Watson 3.
Name TBD — pick during /buildmetric.
WHY — Separation Evidence
Type 1 · classifier lift (held − ctrl winrate)
+5.7pp
Type 2 · real return spread (passers − failers actual returns, pilot)
+10.31pp
Type 2 confidence
HIGH · 97% cov · 1C/0F/58S/0H
Control win rate
80.0% (n=10)
Classification
INVESTIGATE
HOW — Build Path
Blocker
SM Watson 3 has HIGH input overlap with gate rule(s): FCF Efficency — resolve gate first. See references/METRIC_OVERLAP_MAP.md.
#5 · Avg. EPS Growth × FCF-EBITDA Convergence Score × FCF Efficency × PFCF vs PE Spread
READY
T1 +6.5pp · T2 +9.85pp ·
held 89% / ctrl 82% · k=4
WHAT — Plain English
Build composite metric from 4 components: Avg. EPS Growth × FCF-EBITDA Convergence Score × FCF Efficency × PFCF vs PE Spread.
Name TBD — pick during /buildmetric.
WHY — Separation Evidence
Type 1 · classifier lift (held − ctrl winrate)
+6.5pp
Type 2 · real return spread (passers − failers actual returns, pilot)
+9.85pp
Type 2 confidence
HIGH · 94% cov · 0C/0F/101S/0H
Control win rate
82.3% (n=17)
HOW — Build Path
FCF-EBITDA Convergence Score
✓ READY
#6 · Avg. EPS Growth × FCF-EBITDA Convergence Score × Quality Value Score × FCF Efficency
READY
T1 +0.1pp · T2 +9.75pp ·
held 77% / ctrl 77% · k=4
WHAT — Plain English
Build composite metric from 4 components: Avg. EPS Growth × FCF-EBITDA Convergence Score × Quality Value Score × FCF Efficency.
Name TBD — pick during /buildmetric.
WHY — Separation Evidence
Type 1 · classifier lift (held − ctrl winrate)
+0.1pp
Type 2 · real return spread (passers − failers actual returns, pilot)
+9.75pp
Type 2 confidence
HIGH · 95% cov · 0C/0F/200S/0H
Control win rate
77.3% (n=22)
HOW — Build Path
FCF-EBITDA Convergence Score
✓ READY
Quality Value Score
✓ READY
#7 · Avg. EPS Growth × PFCF vs PE Spread × SM Watson 3
BLOCKED
T1 +0.5pp · T2 +9.42pp ·
held 82% / ctrl 82% · k=3
WHAT — Plain English
Build composite metric from 3 components: Avg. EPS Growth × PFCF vs PE Spread × SM Watson 3.
Name TBD — pick during /buildmetric.
WHY — Separation Evidence
Type 1 · classifier lift (held − ctrl winrate)
+0.5pp
Type 2 · real return spread (passers − failers actual returns, pilot)
+9.42pp
Type 2 confidence
HIGH · 89% cov · 1C/0F/69S/0H
Control win rate
81.8% (n=11)
Classification
INVESTIGATE
HOW — Build Path
Blocker
SM Watson 3 has HIGH input overlap with gate rule(s): FCF Efficency — resolve gate first. See references/METRIC_OVERLAP_MAP.md.
#8 · Avg. EPS Growth × Quality Value Score × FCF Efficency × CARC
READY
T1 -4.7pp · T2 +9.01pp ·
held 77% / ctrl 82% · k=4
WHAT — Plain English
Build composite metric from 4 components: Avg. EPS Growth × Quality Value Score × FCF Efficency × CARC.
Name TBD — pick during /buildmetric.
WHY — Separation Evidence
Type 1 · classifier lift (held − ctrl winrate)
-4.7pp
Type 2 · real return spread (passers − failers actual returns, pilot)
+9.01pp
Type 2 confidence
HIGH · 95% cov · 0C/0F/195S/0H
Control win rate
81.8% (n=22)
HOW — Build Path
Quality Value Score
✓ READY
#9 · Avg. EPS Growth × Quality Value Score × PFCF vs PE Spread × SM Watson 3
BLOCKED
T1 +1.2pp · T2 +8.73pp ·
held 81% / ctrl 80% · k=4
WHAT — Plain English
Build composite metric from 4 components: Avg. EPS Growth × Quality Value Score × PFCF vs PE Spread × SM Watson 3.
Name TBD — pick during /buildmetric.
WHY — Separation Evidence
Type 1 · classifier lift (held − ctrl winrate)
+1.2pp
Type 2 · real return spread (passers − failers actual returns, pilot)
+8.73pp
Type 2 confidence
HIGH · 89% cov · 0C/0F/67S/0H
Control win rate
80.0% (n=10)
Classification
INVESTIGATE
HOW — Build Path
Quality Value Score
✓ READY
Blocker
SM Watson 3 has HIGH input overlap with gate rule(s): FCF Efficency — resolve gate first. See references/METRIC_OVERLAP_MAP.md.
#10 · Avg. EPS Growth × Quality Value Score × FCF Efficency
READY
T1 +3.0pp · T2 +8.59pp ·
held 79% / ctrl 76% · k=3
WHAT — Plain English
Build composite metric from 3 components: Avg. EPS Growth × Quality Value Score × FCF Efficency.
Name TBD — pick during /buildmetric.
WHY — Separation Evidence
Type 1 · classifier lift (held − ctrl winrate)
+3.0pp
Type 2 · real return spread (passers − failers actual returns, pilot)
+8.59pp
Type 2 confidence
HIGH · 94% cov · 0C/0F/225S/0H
Control win rate
76.0% (n=25)
HOW — Build Path
Quality Value Score
✓ READY
▾ Show #11–25 (15 more)
#11 · Avg. EPS Growth × FCF Efficency × PFCF vs PE Spread × CARC
READY
T1 +2.4pp · T2 +8.49pp ·
held 86% / ctrl 83% · k=4
WHAT — Plain English
Build composite metric from 4 components: Avg. EPS Growth × FCF Efficency × PFCF vs PE Spread × CARC.
Name TBD — pick during /buildmetric.
WHY — Separation Evidence
Type 1 · classifier lift (held − ctrl winrate)
+2.4pp
Type 2 · real return spread (passers − failers actual returns, pilot)
+8.49pp
Type 2 confidence
HIGH · 94% cov · 0C/0F/110S/0H
Control win rate
83.3% (n=18)
HOW — Build Path
#12 · Avg. EPS Growth × FCF Efficency × PFCF vs PE Spread
READY
T1 +4.0pp · T2 +8.30pp ·
held 88% / ctrl 84% · k=3
WHAT — Plain English
Build composite metric from 3 components: Avg. EPS Growth × FCF Efficency × PFCF vs PE Spread.
Name TBD — pick during /buildmetric.
WHY — Separation Evidence
Type 1 · classifier lift (held − ctrl winrate)
+4.0pp
Type 2 · real return spread (passers − failers actual returns, pilot)
+8.30pp
Type 2 confidence
HIGH · 94% cov · 1C/0F/118S/0H
Control win rate
84.2% (n=19)
HOW — Build Path
#13 · Avg. EPS Growth × Quality Value Score × FCF Efficency × PFCF vs PE Spread
READY
T1 +4.2pp · T2 +7.98pp ·
held 88% / ctrl 83% · k=4
WHAT — Plain English
Build composite metric from 4 components: Avg. EPS Growth × Quality Value Score × FCF Efficency × PFCF vs PE Spread.
Name TBD — pick during /buildmetric.
WHY — Separation Evidence
Type 1 · classifier lift (held − ctrl winrate)
+4.2pp
Type 2 · real return spread (passers − failers actual returns, pilot)
+7.98pp
Type 2 confidence
HIGH · 96% cov · 0C/0F/115S/0H
Control win rate
83.3% (n=18)
HOW — Build Path
Quality Value Score
✓ READY
#14 · Avg. EPS Growth × PFCF vs PE Spread × CARC × SM Watson 3
BLOCKED
T1 -5.0pp · T2 +7.54pp ·
held 75% / ctrl 80% · k=4
WHAT — Plain English
Build composite metric from 4 components: Avg. EPS Growth × PFCF vs PE Spread × CARC × SM Watson 3.
Name TBD — pick during /buildmetric.
WHY — Separation Evidence
Type 1 · classifier lift (held − ctrl winrate)
-5.0pp
Type 2 · real return spread (passers − failers actual returns, pilot)
+7.54pp
Type 2 confidence
HIGH · 90% cov · 0C/0F/60S/0H
Control win rate
80.0% (n=10)
Classification
INVESTIGATE
HOW — Build Path
Blocker
SM Watson 3 has HIGH input overlap with gate rule(s): FCF Efficency — resolve gate first. See references/METRIC_OVERLAP_MAP.md.
#15 · Avg. EPS Growth × Quality Value Score × FCF Efficency × SM Watson 3
BLOCKED
T1 +15.8pp · T2 +6.00pp ·
held 85% / ctrl 69% · k=4
WHAT — Plain English
Build composite metric from 4 components: Avg. EPS Growth × Quality Value Score × FCF Efficency × SM Watson 3.
Name TBD — pick during /buildmetric.
WHY — Separation Evidence
Type 1 · classifier lift (held − ctrl winrate)
+15.8pp
Type 2 · real return spread (passers − failers actual returns, pilot)
+6.00pp
Type 2 confidence
HIGH · 94% cov · 0C/0F/101S/0H
Control win rate
69.2% (n=13)
Classification
INVESTIGATE
HOW — Build Path
Quality Value Score
✓ READY
Blocker
SM Watson 3 has HIGH input overlap with gate rule(s): FCF Efficency — resolve gate first. See references/METRIC_OVERLAP_MAP.md.
#16 · RSI-Net EBITDA Signal × Quality Value Score × FCF Efficency × PFCF vs PE Spread
BLOCKED
T1 +12.9pp · T2 +5.66pp ·
held 93% / ctrl 80% · k=4
WHAT — Plain English
Build composite metric from 4 components: RSI-Net EBITDA Signal × Quality Value Score × FCF Efficency × PFCF vs PE Spread.
Name TBD — pick during /buildmetric.
WHY — Separation Evidence
Type 1 · classifier lift (held − ctrl winrate)
+12.9pp
Type 2 · real return spread (passers − failers actual returns, pilot)
+5.66pp
Type 2 confidence
HIGH · 94% cov · 0C/0F/117S/0H
Control win rate
80.0% (n=10)
Classification
INVESTIGATE
HOW — Build Path
RSI-Net EBITDA Signal
⚠ INVESTIGATE
Quality Value Score
✓ READY
Blocker
RSI-Net EBITDA Signal — Holdings agrees but control disagrees — review secondary metrics sheet
#17 · RSI-Net EBITDA Signal × Quality Value Score × PFCF vs PE Spread × CARC
BLOCKED
T1 +11.7pp · T2 +5.64pp ·
held 92% / ctrl 80% · k=4
WHAT — Plain English
Build composite metric from 4 components: RSI-Net EBITDA Signal × Quality Value Score × PFCF vs PE Spread × CARC.
Name TBD — pick during /buildmetric.
WHY — Separation Evidence
Type 1 · classifier lift (held − ctrl winrate)
+11.7pp
Type 2 · real return spread (passers − failers actual returns, pilot)
+5.64pp
Type 2 confidence
HIGH · 91% cov · 0C/0F/115S/0H
Control win rate
80.0% (n=10)
Classification
INVESTIGATE
HOW — Build Path
RSI-Net EBITDA Signal
⚠ INVESTIGATE
Quality Value Score
✓ READY
Blocker
RSI-Net EBITDA Signal — Holdings agrees but control disagrees — review secondary metrics sheet
#18 · RSI-Net EBITDA Signal × FCF Efficency × PFCF vs PE Spread
BLOCKED
T1 +12.9pp · T2 +5.25pp ·
held 93% / ctrl 80% · k=3
WHAT — Plain English
Build composite metric from 3 components: RSI-Net EBITDA Signal × FCF Efficency × PFCF vs PE Spread.
Name TBD — pick during /buildmetric.
WHY — Separation Evidence
Type 1 · classifier lift (held − ctrl winrate)
+12.9pp
Type 2 · real return spread (passers − failers actual returns, pilot)
+5.25pp
Type 2 confidence
HIGH · 94% cov · 0C/0F/118S/0H
Control win rate
80.0% (n=10)
Classification
INVESTIGATE
HOW — Build Path
RSI-Net EBITDA Signal
⚠ INVESTIGATE
Blocker
RSI-Net EBITDA Signal — Holdings agrees but control disagrees — review secondary metrics sheet
#19 · Avg. EPS Growth × FCF-EBITDA Convergence Score × Quality Value Score × SM Watson 3
BLOCKED
T1 +11.2pp · T2 +5.23pp ·
held 81% / ctrl 70% · k=4
WHAT — Plain English
Build composite metric from 4 components: Avg. EPS Growth × FCF-EBITDA Convergence Score × Quality Value Score × SM Watson 3.
Name TBD — pick during /buildmetric.
WHY — Separation Evidence
Type 1 · classifier lift (held − ctrl winrate)
+11.2pp
Type 2 · real return spread (passers − failers actual returns, pilot)
+5.23pp
Type 2 confidence
HIGH · 95% cov · 0C/0F/92S/0H
Control win rate
70.0% (n=10)
Classification
INVESTIGATE
HOW — Build Path
FCF-EBITDA Convergence Score
✓ READY
Quality Value Score
✓ READY
Blocker
SM Watson 3 has HIGH input overlap with gate rule(s): FCF Efficency — resolve gate first. See references/METRIC_OVERLAP_MAP.md.
#20 · RSI-Net EBITDA Signal × PFCF vs PE Spread × CARC
BLOCKED
T1 +11.7pp · T2 +5.22pp ·
held 92% / ctrl 80% · k=3
WHAT — Plain English
Build composite metric from 3 components: RSI-Net EBITDA Signal × PFCF vs PE Spread × CARC.
Name TBD — pick during /buildmetric.
WHY — Separation Evidence
Type 1 · classifier lift (held − ctrl winrate)
+11.7pp
Type 2 · real return spread (passers − failers actual returns, pilot)
+5.22pp
Type 2 confidence
HIGH · 91% cov · 0C/0F/116S/0H
Control win rate
80.0% (n=10)
Classification
INVESTIGATE
HOW — Build Path
RSI-Net EBITDA Signal
⚠ INVESTIGATE
Blocker
RSI-Net EBITDA Signal — Holdings agrees but control disagrees — review secondary metrics sheet
#21 · RSI-Net EBITDA Signal × FCF Efficency × PFCF vs PE Spread × CARC
BLOCKED
T1 +11.7pp · T2 +5.02pp ·
held 92% / ctrl 80% · k=4
WHAT — Plain English
Build composite metric from 4 components: RSI-Net EBITDA Signal × FCF Efficency × PFCF vs PE Spread × CARC.
Name TBD — pick during /buildmetric.
WHY — Separation Evidence
Type 1 · classifier lift (held − ctrl winrate)
+11.7pp
Type 2 · real return spread (passers − failers actual returns, pilot)
+5.02pp
Type 2 confidence
HIGH · 96% cov · 0C/0F/108S/0H
Control win rate
80.0% (n=10)
Classification
INVESTIGATE
HOW — Build Path
RSI-Net EBITDA Signal
⚠ INVESTIGATE
Blocker
RSI-Net EBITDA Signal — Holdings agrees but control disagrees — review secondary metrics sheet
#22 · Avg. EPS Growth × FCF Efficency × SM Watson 3
BLOCKED
T1 +7.6pp · T2 +4.84pp ·
held 81% / ctrl 73% · k=3
WHAT — Plain English
Build composite metric from 3 components: Avg. EPS Growth × FCF Efficency × SM Watson 3.
Name TBD — pick during /buildmetric.
WHY — Separation Evidence
Type 1 · classifier lift (held − ctrl winrate)
+7.6pp
Type 2 · real return spread (passers − failers actual returns, pilot)
+4.84pp
Type 2 confidence
HIGH · 93% cov · 1C/0F/117S/0H
Control win rate
73.3% (n=15)
Classification
INVESTIGATE
HOW — Build Path
Blocker
SM Watson 3 has HIGH input overlap with gate rule(s): FCF Efficency — resolve gate first. See references/METRIC_OVERLAP_MAP.md.
#23 · Avg. EPS Growth × FCF Efficency × CARC × SM Watson 3
BLOCKED
T1 +5.0pp · T2 +4.83pp ·
held 78% / ctrl 73% · k=4
WHAT — Plain English
Build composite metric from 4 components: Avg. EPS Growth × FCF Efficency × CARC × SM Watson 3.
Name TBD — pick during /buildmetric.
WHY — Separation Evidence
Type 1 · classifier lift (held − ctrl winrate)
+5.0pp
Type 2 · real return spread (passers − failers actual returns, pilot)
+4.83pp
Type 2 confidence
HIGH · 94% cov · 0C/0F/101S/0H
Control win rate
72.7% (n=11)
Classification
INVESTIGATE
HOW — Build Path
Blocker
SM Watson 3 has HIGH input overlap with gate rule(s): FCF Efficency — resolve gate first. See references/METRIC_OVERLAP_MAP.md.
#24 · Avg. EPS Growth × FCF-EBITDA Convergence Score × SM Watson 3
BLOCKED
T1 +5.0pp · T2 +4.52pp ·
held 78% / ctrl 73% · k=3
WHAT — Plain English
Build composite metric from 3 components: Avg. EPS Growth × FCF-EBITDA Convergence Score × SM Watson 3.
Name TBD — pick during /buildmetric.
WHY — Separation Evidence
Type 1 · classifier lift (held − ctrl winrate)
+5.0pp
Type 2 · real return spread (passers − failers actual returns, pilot)
+4.52pp
Type 2 confidence
HIGH · 94% cov · 0C/0F/106S/0H
Control win rate
72.7% (n=11)
Classification
INVESTIGATE
HOW — Build Path
FCF-EBITDA Convergence Score
✓ READY
Blocker
SM Watson 3 has HIGH input overlap with gate rule(s): FCF Efficency — resolve gate first. See references/METRIC_OVERLAP_MAP.md.
#25 · Avg. EPS Growth × FCF-EBITDA Convergence Score × FCF Efficency × SM Watson 3
BLOCKED
T1 +8.5pp · T2 +4.39pp ·
held 81% / ctrl 73% · k=4
WHAT — Plain English
Build composite metric from 4 components: Avg. EPS Growth × FCF-EBITDA Convergence Score × FCF Efficency × SM Watson 3.
Name TBD — pick during /buildmetric.
WHY — Separation Evidence
Type 1 · classifier lift (held − ctrl winrate)
+8.5pp
Type 2 · real return spread (passers − failers actual returns, pilot)
+4.39pp
Type 2 confidence
HIGH · 95% cov · 0C/0F/105S/0H
Control win rate
72.7% (n=11)
Classification
INVESTIGATE
HOW — Build Path
FCF-EBITDA Convergence Score
✓ READY
Blocker
SM Watson 3 has HIGH input overlap with gate rule(s): FCF Efficency — resolve gate first. See references/METRIC_OVERLAP_MAP.md.
▾ L1+L2 Hybrid Candidates (10 of 8,278) — tap to expand
Combos drawn from L1+L2 hybrid pool — each contains ≥1 L1 metric. Sorted by lift pp.
#1 · roe + EPS-ROA PE Score
A
lift +79.3pp ·
wr 100% (base 21%) · k=2 · n=20
Combo
roe + EPS-ROA PE Score
Win rate
100.0% (baseline 20.65%)
#2 · EPS-ROA PE Score + Beta x ROE x EV/EBITDA + ROIC − FCF Yield
A
lift +79.3pp ·
wr 100% (base 21%) · k=3 · n=20
Combo
EPS-ROA PE Score + Beta x ROE x EV/EBITDA + ROIC − FCF Yield
Win rate
100.0% (baseline 20.65%)
#3 · EPS-ROA PE Score + Beta x ROE x EV/EBITDA + FCF Yield − ROIC
A
lift +79.3pp ·
wr 100% (base 21%) · k=3 · n=20
Combo
EPS-ROA PE Score + Beta x ROE x EV/EBITDA + FCF Yield − ROIC
Win rate
100.0% (baseline 20.65%)
#4 · Avg. EPS Growth + ROIC × P/FCF + ROIC − FCF Yield
A
lift +79.3pp ·
wr 100% (base 21%) · k=3 · n=20
Combo
Avg. EPS Growth + ROIC × P/FCF + ROIC − FCF Yield
Win rate
100.0% (baseline 20.65%)
#5 · Avg. EPS Growth + ROIC × P/FCF + FCF Yield − ROIC
A
lift +79.3pp ·
wr 100% (base 21%) · k=3 · n=20
Combo
Avg. EPS Growth + ROIC × P/FCF + FCF Yield − ROIC
Win rate
100.0% (baseline 20.65%)
#6 · Avg. EPS Growth + ROI × P/FCF + ROIC − FCF Yield
A
lift +79.3pp ·
wr 100% (base 21%) · k=3 · n=20
Combo
Avg. EPS Growth + ROI × P/FCF + ROIC − FCF Yield
Win rate
100.0% (baseline 20.65%)
#7 · Avg. EPS Growth + ROI × P/FCF + FCF Yield − ROIC
A
lift +79.3pp ·
wr 100% (base 21%) · k=3 · n=20
Combo
Avg. EPS Growth + ROI × P/FCF + FCF Yield − ROIC
Win rate
100.0% (baseline 20.65%)
#8 · EPS-ROA PE Score + Beta x ROE x EV/EBITDA + ROIC − FCF Yield
A
lift +79.3pp ·
wr 100% (base 21%) · k=4 · n=20
Combo
EPS-ROA PE Score + Beta x ROE x EV/EBITDA + ROIC − FCF Yield + FCF Yield − ROIC
Win rate
100.0% (baseline 20.65%)
#9 · Avg. EPS Growth + ROIC × P/FCF + ROI × P/FCF + ROIC − FCF Yi
A
lift +79.3pp ·
wr 100% (base 21%) · k=4 · n=20
Combo
Avg. EPS Growth + ROIC × P/FCF + ROI × P/FCF + ROIC − FCF Yield
Win rate
100.0% (baseline 20.65%)
#10 · Avg. EPS Growth + ROIC × P/FCF + ROI × P/FCF + FCF Yield − R
A
lift +79.3pp ·
wr 100% (base 21%) · k=4 · n=20
Combo
Avg. EPS Growth + ROIC × P/FCF + ROI × P/FCF + FCF Yield − ROIC
Win rate
100.0% (baseline 20.65%)
What This Means
Build Lab ranks BF combos by signal strength.
Sep pp = held win rate − control win rate (the separation mechanism).
Ready = all components built; can run /buildmetric directly.
Blocked = a component is missing or unbuilt — see expanded row for blocker reason.
ℹ Generated 2026-08-23 21:48:45 ET
Source: metric_build_queue_new.csv
Pipeline run: 2026-08-23