✦ Discovery
Formula candidates · Gate rules · Screening combos
Formula Build Candidates — Top 10
Mathematical combos to build as new Sheets columns. Win rate vs ~8% baseline.
L2 PEG Adj. Hybrid Growth / SM3: Quality-Overvaluation Wildcard ▼
23.3% win +15.2pp lift ↑ Higher 31% cov
Components: A: PEG Adj. Hybrid Growth · B: SM3: Quality-Overvaluation Wildcard
Op logic: SM3: Quality-Overvaluation Wildcard ÷ PEG Adj. Hybrid Growth — normalizes SM3: Quality-Overvaluation Wildcard by PEG Adj. Hybrid Growth. Reveals quality per unit of PEG Adj. Hybrid Growth; strips out scale distortion.
Uniqueness: HIGH · Coverage: 31%
SM3: Quality-Overvaluation Wildcard / PEG Adj. Hybrid Growth
L2 EBITDA Overvaluation Risk (value trapper) / PEG Adj. Hybrid Growth ▼
23.3% win +15.2pp lift ↑ Higher 31% cov
Components: A: EBITDA Overvaluation Risk (value trapper) · B: PEG Adj. Hybrid Growth
Op logic: EBITDA Overvaluation Risk (value trapper) ÷ PEG Adj. Hybrid Growth — normalizes EBITDA Overvaluation Risk (value trapper) by PEG Adj. Hybrid Growth. High ratio = strong EBITDA Overvaluation Risk (value trapper) relative to PEG Adj. Hybrid Growth.
Uniqueness: HIGH · Coverage: 31%
EBITDA Overvaluation Risk (value trapper) / PEG Adj. Hybrid Growth
L2 EBITDA Overvaluation Risk (value trapper) x ROIC/Ebitda Spread ▼
21.4% win +13.3pp lift ↑ Higher 45% cov
Components: A: EBITDA Overvaluation Risk (value trapper) · B: ROIC/Ebitda Spread
Op logic: EBITDA Overvaluation Risk (value trapper) × ROIC/Ebitda Spread — both must be strong simultaneously. One weak input pulls the combined score down.
Uniqueness: HIGH · Coverage: 45%
EBITDA Overvaluation Risk (value trapper) x ROIC/Ebitda Spread
L2 ROIC/Ebitda Spread x SM3: Quality-Overvaluation Wildcard ▼
21.4% win +13.3pp lift ↑ Higher 43% cov
Components: A: ROIC/Ebitda Spread · B: SM3: Quality-Overvaluation Wildcard
Op logic: ROIC/Ebitda Spread × SM3: Quality-Overvaluation Wildcard — both must be strong simultaneously. One weak input pulls the combined score down.
Uniqueness: HIGH · Coverage: 43%
ROIC/Ebitda Spread x SM3: Quality-Overvaluation Wildcard
L2 FCF Efficency / Profit Efficiency Value ▼
20.8% win +12.7pp lift ↑ Higher 47% cov
Components: A: FCF Efficency · B: Profit Efficiency Value
Op logic: Profit Efficiency Value ÷ FCF Efficency — normalizes Profit Efficiency Value by FCF Efficency. Reveals quality per unit of FCF Efficency; strips out scale distortion.
Uniqueness: HIGH · Coverage: 47%
Profit Efficiency Value / FCF Efficency
L2 ROIC/Ebitda Spread x ROIC Cap Valuation ▼
20.2% win +12.1pp lift ↑ Higher 49% cov
Components: A: ROIC/Ebitda Spread · B: ROIC Cap Valuation
Op logic: ROIC/Ebitda Spread × ROIC Cap Valuation — both must be strong simultaneously. One weak input pulls the combined score down.
Uniqueness: LOW · Coverage: 49%
ROIC/Ebitda Spread x ROIC Cap Valuation
L2 EBITDA Overvaluation Risk (value trapper) x ROIC Cap Valuation ▼
20.0% win +11.9pp lift ↑ Higher 45% cov
Components: A: EBITDA Overvaluation Risk (value trapper) · B: ROIC Cap Valuation
Op logic: EBITDA Overvaluation Risk (value trapper) × ROIC Cap Valuation — both must be strong simultaneously. One weak input pulls the combined score down.
Uniqueness: HIGH · Coverage: 45%
EBITDA Overvaluation Risk (value trapper) x ROIC Cap Valuation
L1 ROIC × EPS next 5Y ▼
|d|=1.468 ↑ Higher
Components: A: ROIC · B: EPS next 5Y
Op logic:
L1 ROI × EPS next 5Y ▼
|d|=1.468 ↑ Higher
Components: A: ROI · B: EPS next 5Y
Op logic:
L1 ROIC ÷ (FCF Yield+1) ▼
|d|=1.351 ↑ Higher
Components: A: ROIC · B: FCF Yield
Op logic:
L2 × L2 Formula Candidates — Top 15
L1 × L1 Formula Candidates — Top 10
Ranked by Cohen's d — win rate computation coming soon.
ROIC × EPS next 5Y ▼
|d|=1.468 ↑ Higher
Components: A: ROIC · B: EPS next 5Y
Op logic:
ROI × EPS next 5Y ▼
|d|=1.468 ↑ Higher
Components: A: ROI · B: EPS next 5Y
Op logic:
ROIC ÷ (FCF Yield+1) ▼
|d|=1.351 ↑ Higher
Components: A: ROIC · B: FCF Yield
Op logic:
ROI ÷ (FCF Yield+1) ▼
|d|=1.351 ↑ Higher
Components: A: FCF Yield · B: ROI
Op logic:
ROIC ÷ FCF Yield ▼
|d|=1.264 ↑ Higher
Components: A: ROIC · B: FCF Yield
Op logic:
ROI ÷ FCF Yield ▼
|d|=1.264 ↑ Higher
Components: A: FCF Yield · B: ROI
Op logic:
P/S ÷ (FCF Yield+1) ▼
|d|=1.260 ↑ Higher
Components: A: FCF Yield · B: P/S
Op logic:
ROIC × P/FCF ▼
|d|=1.195 ↑ Higher
Components: A: ROIC · B: P/FCF
Op logic:
ROI × P/FCF ▼
|d|=1.195 ↑ Higher
Components: A: ROI · B: P/FCF
Op logic:
ROA ÷ (FCF Yield+1) ▼
|d|=1.184 ↑ Higher
Components: A: FCF Yield · B: ROA
Op logic:
Active Gate Rules (5 rules · MAX_WS=330)
RSI-Net EBITDA
wt=61
col 65
FCF Efficiency
wt=70
col 31
ROIC-EBITDA QC
wt=70
col 59
Avg EPS Growth
wt=69
col 52
FCF Quality
wt=60
col 57
Data: 8.23.26 · Formula Lab desktop for full detail + collapsible rows